NEELAB CNG FILLING STATION versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINE LTD
Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 9 and O. VII, R 10 Civil Courts, Maximum UB Just Jurisdiction of IB Treatment (Where there is a Right, a Remedy) Applicable Plaintiffs Remit Excessive Bills Gas authorities trial court returned the case under OI VI, R, 10 CPC and sought the remedy before the consumer court (where there is a right, no remedy). Was the basic principle. The court had a similar treatment with respect to the institute suit, unless the jurisdiction of the court was restricted under the provision of Section 9 CPC, civil courts were given the general jurisdiction that they should be citizens Hear all cases of a nature wherever the object of the proceedings was the enforcement of civil rights, a civil court has the power to independently prosecute the Constitution as long as its identity is clear on section 3 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Consumer Protection Act 1997 Was not imposed or otherwise prohibited, except as otherwise provided by law Implementation and the civil court's jurisdiction could not be abolished by the trial court had misunderstood the issue and mistakenly believed that the consumer was not involved in some of the issues with the establishment of the court. The jurisdiction of the High Court was dismissed. Set an order passed by the trial court and the appeal was subsequently granted
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
