Instead of filing a petition for revocation of the first revision request filed by the applicant, the second petition of the Pakistan (Administration for Evacuation Property) Act, 1957, section 18A & 43, the second petition of the reviewer, dismissed the charge and the applicant. Another review petition filed more than 3 1/2 years after the first revision request was dismissed, which was rejected by Custodian over time, and the applicant contended that he had served in the Army Service. I live, his lawyer did not inform him of his decision. Prior to the dismissal of the First Amendment request, no affidavit of attorney was filed in support of the said ground before the High Court or the Supreme Court Constitution was canceled because it was not a recognized basis for the late condolences because The lawyer will be negligent. His client's negligence will be considered for a later period of more than three years, but he also fails to disclose any new grounds for filing a review request, requesting a second review. Custodian rightly excluded, because he was hopelessly time-bound and ineligible.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
