Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD AHMED versus MUHAMMAD IDREES

Civil Procedure Code of CPC Matters Order V and Service of Summons OV, RR 1, 17 and O, XL V11, R l Rules of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court, 1978, 0 1, R 5 Defendant respondents of summons. After refusing to submit a summons against the defendant, the court refused to summon the summons which is a substantial service and there was no other formal status for its completion because if any person summons. If he refused, he would be deemed to have served the applicant who had disappeared from the proceedings before the Supreme Court and said that he had called the Supreme Court shortly after. Learned of TK's decision which was subsequently announced without disclosure of the information on which he was obliged to argue that in this case the proper method of non-acceptance of service by the defendant. The defendant's affidavit was to affix the summons as provided under OV, R17, the CPC was repulsed in view of the fact that this was clearly the Supreme Court's rules, Provided that in Rule 1, 1980, R5, the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 shall not apply to proceedings in the Supreme Court. property advocates from Jhudo lawyer