Find a Lawyer

AJ&K GOVERNMENT versus GHULAM RASOOL LOON

By Appeal to maintain maintenance of appeal filed by Government in section 42 High Court of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Rr 17, 23 and 29 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974). The execution proceedings against the approved orders were challenged on the basis that the government had approved the writ petition before the High Court, but instead appealed, which was able to be rejected. The High Court dismissed the appeal as the sole technical ground justified by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Law Department, because it was filed without proper authorization. Under the provisions of R17 of 1984, an appeal or revision and expression suit should be submitted to the government stating that the constitution includes R23. Appeals and petitions for the implementation of the decree and for review or revision of any civil court proceeding in which the state or public officer is in his office. The competence was a party or strictly used the writ petition for the interests of the High Court. What was wrongly written in the government's sanction, the appeal was not justified in dismissing such a narrow construction should not be done to the High Court as it had in the extreme irregularities which were treatable. Received a remand to re-judge the case registration advocate from Khanpur lawyer