MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Business Laws of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Section 6 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government Rules of Business, R23 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 12 and 42 exclude a village from any district and Another district notice in which the village was excluded from District B and incorporated in District P. Due to its geographical status and historical background it is stated that the village is part of District B / Affected people cannot prove their request by bringing. Any evidence of the record executive authority of Azad Jammu and Kashmir government was to be used by the Prime Minister and the Government of the Ministers in the name of the President, which was to be executed by the Prime Minister who was the Chief Executive Prime Minister. In the performance of functions, Azad can work directly or through ministers under section 12 of Jammu and Kas. The Hamer Interim Constitution Act, 1974, the Prime Minister issued a notification regarding the transformation of the village district, including the present In view of the circumstances, it was raised by the appellants that the matter should have been related to the important political policy under R23 of the rules business. The cabinet was put before the dismissal because it was not raised in the petition or otherwise there was hardly any political significance that in view of the present situation, the Prime Minister of the cabinet must have done so as long as he Pass orders without asking for any report from anyone. On the demand of all the members of the Union Council High Court, the committee was rightly included in the second district, which filed against the change of the village district.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Minchanabad lawyer