Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 420, 406, 468, 379 and 427 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), accused of verifying section 439 evidence, did not remove any goods from the possession of anyone else and were part of the crime of theft. ? Not satisfied that the accused was acquitted of the charge under Section 9379, according to PPC there was no evidence on record that the accused had cheated the complainant and made him property fraudulently or dishonestly. Which was in accordance with the Complainant. At the request of the complainant's friends, the accused was handed over in the name of Allah, thus no cheating case was brought against the accused and he was tried and convicted under Section 20, PP. The accused was released. The complainant did not intend to do any wrong or harm to any person, but his intention was to make two rooms instead of one room in Mansaria. Thus, the offense of misconduct was, therefore, missing and the accused was acquitted under section 427; the PPC accused, however, changed his luggage belonging to the complainant himself who had fallen on the spot and Was under guilt. Section 6406, PPC has been proved against him, according to which his conviction and sentence have been adjudicated accordingly, it does not indicate whether the accused had to use a false oath or in fact his The source was used for the purpose of defrauding someone who was required under Section 68, 68, PPC under section 686868, PPC crime components were not proven against the accused and were punished accordingly Was set aside, but instead it was 46 465, PPC famous high court advocate from Shorkot lawyer