PATHANI versus MUHAMMAD YAR
The Code of Conduct 1908, Section 12 (2) and OXXIII, R3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the decision to approve the constitutional application was challenged on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation on the statement of the applicant's counsel. Was approved as a waiver. The petitioner, who had been presenting on his behalf in the county for almost two years, alleged that he did not engage the said lawyer and did not give him the powers of a lawyer and that he had filed the petition under section 12 (2). Statement of withdrawal is not authorized. ), CPC Both courts, after proper appreciation of the evidence, discovered that the applicant engaged with the lawyer who appeared in the court and used the powers under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Made a statement to withdraw. Jurisdiction to decide your findings of fact with the decisions of the courts below
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer
