Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ AKMAL versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND)/CLAIMS COMMISSIONER

Martial Law Regulation 1961 No. 89 Para 7 West Pakistan Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme (Rural), 1956, Paras 64 and 68 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Proposal of Allotment in favor of Claimant Effectiveness of Constitutional Application of Land Against Certified Claims After the allotment, the petitioner's privilege certificate was amended and it was proposed to allocate the suitland, which was cleared in the absence of a certification order and returned to the central government. Private respondents were then allocated so that the order approving the change of correction was set aside. After the High Court remanded in the petitioner's petition and constitutional petition filed by the case, the fresh decision in accordance with the law in keeping with the Commissioner of his entitlement to maintain the allotment in favor of the restoration of the authority and the private respondents. The settlement commissioner was remanded for. The Commissioner, while passing the imaging or Dyer opted to follow Patwari's statement instead of looking at the law and wanted to follow the guidelines / observations contained in the High Court order which had been filed in connection with the proposed land. The absence of the will does not assert the right and the interest in its claimant settlement authority was stable. Is required to approve formal certification orders and to hand over the proposed land holdings in favor of the claimant after the expiry of 15 days. The foregoing of the applications in the fresh allotment was to include the land allotted under the mandatory provisions of para 7 (2) of the claim scrutiny. Unable to revoke the Proposal for Equity Property Regulation, 1961 best law firm from Rahimyar Khan lawyer