SALIA BIBI versus MULAZIM HUSSAIN
Section 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 99 constitutional application to terminate the marriage on the basis of dismissal, the Family Court rejected the view of the dissolution of marriage, but the marital rights appeal Hearing of her husband's trial, the court dismissed the appeal filed by the wife, which led to the allegations of wrongdoing against her husband. The husband also accused the wife of instability, which did not prove that there was a long litigation between the parties, if the wife had spent 17/18 years in distress. During harmony with the husband, he had no reason to condemn her for having spent the whole of her life in distress with a man, for the sake of the children, it was necessary to maintain the marriage, since the present case. I too was not legit. The children were neither living with the father nor caring for them, but the older boys were earning their living and helping them. On the question of the court, the wife told her younger siblings that she was the husband. Instead of living together, there was no possibility of reconciliation between the parties, and this would only aggravate their difficulties if they were forced to remain in the marriage bond. Wife's claim over worry rejected, High Court accepts constitutional plea, decision and order to dissolve marriage based on sincerity The case of Amat and Wives was unconditionally canceled because it was not disclosed that they had. There was no benefit to the husband at the time of marriage
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Lodhran lawyer