Section 9 (c) Drug Control (Government Analyst) Regulations, 2001, 4 and 5 identified and smuggled drugs into evidence, the accused was arrested in a packet of police based on confidential information. And 175kg of hashish was seized and the trial court targeted the convicted and convicted under section 9 (c) of the Drugs Control Act of 1997 with a concealed carry from the vehicle and was arrested on the spot. The FIR was filed immediately. The officer (s) were examined for a long time but nothing was obtained in favor of the defense. The complainant's statement was fully consistent with the facts and contents of the FIR and the prosecution witnesses (police officers) ) Minor contradictions in the statement were not enough to make the prosecution's case or recovery doubtful The forensic science report confirmed that all the samples sent were marijuana, delaying the sending of samples to the Franz Science Laboratory. The case was not fatal because Rule 4 and 5 of the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Proposal) The car) rules do not restrict more than 72 hours to send samples to seize the investigating officer in 2001. Recovery of defects The recovery of large quantities of marijuana from the secret caves of the vehicles proved beyond any doubt that the appeal was dismissed and the accused's conviction upheld.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
