The jirga raised the denial of a financial dispute between the complainant and the accused, opening the bank account and issuing a check to the complainant. Demanded. The petition filed by the accused was dishonored because the account was not in the name of the accused but in the name of his father an FIR was lodged against the accused but he was released on bail under certain conditions. Failed to meet conditions. Bail order and subsequently his bail was returned. Among the convictions was that the financial dispute between the parties was the subject of criminal prosecution. Since the accused filed a declaratory claim against the complainant in connection with the financial liability and scrutiny because the check was forcibly obtained from the accused, and that it does not fall under the prohibition clause of section 497, Accused gave the complainant a check knowing the fact that the check was from the account of the accused's father, the accused did not deny his signature on the check nor mentioned the amount but he did not It was requested that a forcible check was obtained. And in this regard, he also filed a declaratory suit record stating that the accused's declaration of trial was dismissed for illegal prosecution. CRPC does not fall under the prohibited clause. An overview of the facts and circumstances of the case, others also fell victim to such conspiracies.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
