Section 2 30un Constitutional evidence (10 of 1984 evidence of46), payment of Rs. 300,000 as compensation to the legal heirs of the defendant, in case of injury, filed an FIR shortly after the incident and filed an affidavit. Police were called to the scene in the presence of a witness, and two certified men directly accused the accused. The specific role of the shooter and the motivator of the incident was also revealed as Fir Lajarim, the deceased, later died at the hospital. Therefore, the FIR was to be treated as his dying declaration. The statement was also supported. Medical evidence and the suspect's long-running crime weapon was recovered from the suspect's disclosure and identification allegedly proved beyond any doubt, however, since the accused was fifty years old and the facts and circumstances of the case. In light of the evidence and in the light of the evidence provided by the prosecution, the sentence of life imprisonment rather than death will serve its purpose. The accused's justice crime was sustained, however his death sentence was changed to life imprisonment and the legal legacy of the victim was increased by Rs 600,000 to pay compensation, the accused was sent to Section 382B, CRPC. The benefit was denied because it had a long fame of 5 years and accordingly the appeal was settled
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
