ABDULLAH versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 451 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 439 did not commit any theft The accused was identified as having been made with the help of a torch and light bulb, but not a bulb. The recovered imports were neither presented by the prosecution nor by the prosecution when the FIR was filed after a delay of thirteen hours during the trial and it was stated that the delay was not explained by the prosecution. But the statements of the prosecution witnesses were recorded 24 hours later. They were available at the court premises below. He did not conform to the provisions of section 451, PPC and did not comply with his court mind and the evidence was not properly weighed and the prosecution failed to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt. Has been and is illegally compiled by the following two courts, without considering all the concurrent decisions, the courts below were set aside for review.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocates from Fizagat lawyer