Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus ZAFARULLAH KHAN

Sindh Tenant Limitation Ordinance 1979 Sections 15 (2) (ii) and 18 Change of property ownership By default on payment of rent the tenant's eviction in question is actually the brother of the applicant / landlord but no settlement Because of the two brothers who arrived there, the property became the exclusive / exclusive property of the applicant who was also entitled to receive the rent from the tenant properly. The tenant was informed of the change in ownership of the property by taking notice under section 18 of his service. Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, but the tenant, applicant / new owner, failed to take notice or tender from the landlord and failed to submit the rent in the name of the previous owner, in effect paying the rent in the name of the former owner. ? The tenant cannot terminate this law with the obligation to pay rent to the new landlord / landlord. Relations between the landlord and the tenant with the tenant were not denied The notice of change of ownership was not properly signed by the tenant but nothing was on record to show that After being notified of the change of landlord, the tenant offered the rent to the new landlord and, in the case of refusal, accepted his option. According to this law, a landlord who does not own a landlord did not have any benefit to the tenant, in which case, it was properly ordered that the payment of the rent was done intentionally because of default. The property should be evacuated. jobs for fresh advocates from Jacobabad lawyer