MUSTOO versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/365 A / 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 342 Law in Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 122 Identification of evidence in parade identified only piece of evidence against the accused. The identification was in the parade, but the accused was not exposed to this piece of evidence during his examination on the back of recording the accused's statement under Section 342, Section 342, under CRPC Wisdom, on the principle of CCP. It was based on the fact that no one would be heard and the accused should be heard and in every case of evidence presented against them, it would provide the opportunity for the first person to be denied. Come. Their identification was kept with the accused during the inquiry; in fact they were deprived of their right to stay. The sentence given to the accused could not be retained. The trial court's decision was set aside and the trial court adjourned. Was given so as to instruct the defendant to record all the defamatory evidence, including the identification parade, to record the statements.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer