Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 307, 324 and 506/34 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), the testimony of the Section 13D prosecution, defined that the regular armed suspect from the Revolvers came to the prosecutor's witness's office. ? , But he was not in the office and the suspect fired from the job: the complainant and other prosecution witnesses who were present but escaped and did not maintain it on their bodies, even at the mercy of the accused. Who was regularly armed with revolvers, but he was not harmed and it was specifically stated by the complainant and witnesses that the accused then fled to the trial court's decision otherwise section 307/324/34. Was subjected to illegal crime. , PPC against the accused and Section 13D of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, was not constituted, and the trial court found the accused guilty. For six months, the RPI was illegal under the law under Section 6 which6 of the PPC because the offense of minor offense was illegal where no major crime was charged, the trial court took illegal action. As such, the facts were passed without applying the judicial mind. The conviction and sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court were set aside, giving them the benefit of the doubt. us immigration advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer