Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD HUSSAIN BHATTI versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Definition of Section 342 Evidence The trial court failed to interpret the evidence while convicting the accused and was not convinced of the prosecution case against the accompanying accomplice. In this case, the evidence against the accused was filed after a period of about nine to nine months without showing any valid reason for the FIR, with no significant explanation for the benefit delay. In the absence of the accused will go to the accused. The prosecution's witnesses specifically showed the particular act by which the accused actually misused the money, and no direct or indirect evidence was available against the accused, neither the complainant nor any other witness. Specifically, the time, date or manner in which this crime was committed. Saying that it began on a particular date and ended with one would not be enough to hold anyone accountable for the crime, especially without explaining the manner and responsibility in this regard. The accused person was not the person who allegedly received the exclusive custody / domain on cash penalties, which was the main ingredient of sentencing in his absence. After seizing special charges, control and illicit use of property, the accused cannot be prosecuted. The co-accused who confessed to the crime had clearly admitted in his confessional statement that he was responsible for the misuse of the money, which was heard by the trial court. The stated version of the participant was frequently ignored for any credible reasons and in his confessional statement Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mangi lawyer