Find a Lawyer

FAKHRUDDIN KHAN versus RUBY RICE AND GENERAL MILLS LIMITED

Companies Ordinance 1984 Section 10 Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 HC Appeal Maintenance Company was injured and earlier accepted the bid of the Appellant / Successful Bidder for the purchase of the Company's assets. The order was withdrawn and the appellant filed an appeal before the High Court disputing the question on the issue of maintaining the appeal on the controversial order to withdraw his bid that after the company received an injunction. All appeals against a sanctioned order can be preferred only before the Supreme Court, either as a matter of fact or exclusive. Through the holiday. Under section 10 (1) of the Companies Ordinance, only the order of a company to be consolidated under the validity of 1984 was to appear before the Supreme Court, but any other direction, decision or decision related to the direction would be appealed. Is. Up, through a company judge, the High Court's order would lie which section 10 (1), the Companies Ordinance, 1984 did not apply, was necessary as a real citizen of a high court Was granted under jurisdiction and was hereby presented to the Division Bench under section 15, Code of Conduct (Amendment) Ordinance, 1980 as an objection to maintaining an appeal against a company judge's order. Earlier, the order to accept the appellant's bid to purchase the assets of the injured company was withdrawn, dismissed and an appeal could also be made to the Division Bench for appropriate orders. list of advocates from Pindi bhohri lawyer