NAWAB DIN versus ANWAR KAMAL SHAH
Section 68 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) witness processor server, which could not issue summons to the prosecution's witnesses, requested more time to repeat the process, but no further action was assigned to it. The investigating officer also said the prosecutor could not be a witness. On the basis of their finding of the appropriate address, the trial court did not pass any order on the inquiry officer's statement that it was appropriate or invalid or did not repeat the process under which the trial court made the statement of the investigating officer. Recorded and announced after closing the prosecution. Decision on the said date After the trial court adjourned the case without expeditious efforts to obtain the presence of prosecution witnesses, the trial court's decision was set aside and remanded for re-examination of the case. had gone. Decide the testimony of the complainant and the prosecutor according to the law
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Farooqabad lawyer
