Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD versus THE STATE

The accused in the testimony of Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 alleged that the rifle was allegedly recovered from him, which was in fact a licensed weapon of the man who dashed along with his rifle. And when the police did this, the rifle was lying there and the police took it with them. The prosecution did not deny that the rifle was a licensed weapon of another person, under the circumstances, it could not be declared illegal, under the circumstances, it was alleged that the rifle was recovered from the suspect's possession. In fact, it was merely reduced to the extent of a technical offense because the essential component of the crime was the lack of a mens RA. Recovery took place illegally. The arm should not have been easily acknowledged, the potential for explanation as being true of the accused, cannot be ignored. He was sentenced, sentenced and sentenced by the following courts, which were set aside in the circumstances. us immigration advocates from Jaranwala lawyer