Find a Lawyer

NOOR SHAH THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), RAWALPINDI/THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND), RAWALPINDI

Sections 10 and 11 of the Evacuation Property and Displaced Persons Act (1975) Act and the Evacuation of Immigrants Act (XIV of 1975) Act, Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application The failure to investigate the illegal allotment was transferred to the name of the disputed property applicants (pre-emptor) for joining the parties, which resulted in the shopkeepers deciding in their favor in the pre-settlement suit. Had allotments of property against their verified claims, informed by the informed officer on the plea request canceled the allotment As the legal applicants / pre-emptors were not part of the inquiry process and their cancellation order was approved, the validation order was executed, conversion on order basis The transfer was confirmed which was supported. Applicants / Pre-Importers and Transfers were included in Revenue Revenue by the Revenue Authority Valuable rights were thus created in favor of the applicants / former emperors where the applicants / pre-emperors provided opportunities for their hearing. Were not investigated and investigated on their backs, violating the rules of the order passed by the Settlement Administration, the natural justice of the Audi Ultram Partum applicant / pre-emptor, and approved in his absence. Cancellation order canceling allotted disputed property allotment And such orders suffered a basic legal act has been put in and the case pending best law firms from Hattian lawyer