Find a Lawyer

CH. LIAQAT ALI versus MIRZA ABDUL AZR

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 & 42 Contract and Declaration The suit for the special performance of the plaintiff claimed that he had purchased the plot in a dispute through a sale agreement with the defendant, but the plaintiff later committed fraud. The plot was secretly transferred in favor of the other person. The plaintiff prayed that the subsequent sale be annulled against its interests, and that the specific performance of the contract be passed on the basis of the sale agreement allegedly executed in its favor, The plaintiff also entered into a contract to sell the plot in the execution dispute. Selling a valid contract will not create any rights, and the plaintiff will not be entitled to any title because under this agreement, the plaintiff had taken no other action to fail to enforce the contract. The whole claim was. On the basis of this, there was no jurisdiction on the basis that the suit was rightly rejected by the trial court orders of A and the High Court and the High Court under which the judgment and order passed by the trial court were set aside. GO, Supreme Court in Trial Court Reinstatement Appeal female advocates from Shogram lawyer