Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD DIN versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AJ&K GOVERNMENT, MUZAFFARABAD

Section 18A, 18B & 43 (6) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974, VIII of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), the allocation of section 42 land, the cancellation of the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, The auto-jurisdiction under section 43b (b) (Administration for Vacant Property) Act ? 1957 su, devoted to the use, observed that the cancellation of the land allotment in favor of the appellant / allies observed that a Family allotments and their fathers are not entitled to more than a fixed allotment. Since he was a minor and was not the head of his family at the time of the allotment in his favor, the question regarding the legal status of the allotment could only and could not be passed in the password of the equity property in exercise of powers under section 43 (6). The other authority was based on a thorough investigation into such a question about the fort, which was monitored and confirmed by the High Court finding the fact recorded by the custody. It was a special jurisdiction tribunal, and which was also affirmed by the High Court, could not be remedied by the Supreme Court in the appeal, the fact that the application for cancellation of land allotment in the dispute was invalid. The section was mentioned, would not render the judgment of Custodian's invalid question nor was it taken before neither the Custodian nor the High Court, nor for the first time before the Supreme Court. Can be allowed to go, especially when no place to honor this aspect was taken either by memo appeal or brief Yan top advocates from Lala rukh lawyer