MEHRBAN HUSSAIN versus THE STATE
The applicant was a fugitive with a surety in the sum of Rs. Had held bail. In order to pay the full amount of the bail bond seized by the trial court, the applicants had, no doubt, made no real effort to secure the attendance of the accused, but at the same time the accused was arrested. In the circumstances, the interest of justice should be served only if the applicant was fined Rs. 50,000 only. Consequently, the order was amended to direct the applicant to submit only Rs. 50,000 to the trial court instead of Rs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Orakzai lawyer
