Find a Lawyer

KAMDAR KHAN versus HAZRAT AKBAR

Section & property complaint of illegal property seizure, etc. No evidence of companionship with the occupants of the land is excluded Police report disregarding civil rights of disputed property pending illegal disposal The complainant (s) are alleged to have illegally seized the same complaint under Sections 3 and 4 of the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 by proceeding with the trial by the parties to the legal case. Pending. After the failure of the civil litigation, there is no evidence of a complaint that the accused (respondents) were about to occupy the land. Police did not submit their opinion under Section 7373, CRPC, that the accused persons. Had shaken up the controversial land or that they had located the complainant illegally. The complaint was rightly rejected The amendment request was dismissed under the circumstances

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• SHAH RUKH v. State 2013 PCrLJ 237
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX COMPANIES, PESHAWAR v. PAKISTAN REFRIGERATION (PVT.) LTD., PESHAWAR 2013 PTD 240
• WAQIF KHAN v. NASRULLAH 2013 YLR 241
• Ret. Brig. IJAZ AKBAR v. State 2013 MLD 250
• AFTAB KHAN v. The GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2013 PCrLJ 272
• ATTAULLAH v. GHULAM SARWAR 2013 MLD 276
• AMJID ALI v. State 2013 PCrLJ 282
• MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH v. The STATE through AG, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 2013 PCrLJ 290

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

registration advocate from Machi Goth lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes