BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 promptly filed an FIR appreciating the evidence that the accused had given death to the deceased because it was a normal day and this was undoubtedly true. The motive did not prove inadequate or objective, there was no less punishment, the accused was a witness in the abduction of his nephew, which was registered 3 days before the incident in which the accused had only one pill. And he did not repeat it. Both of these facts were sufficient to reduce the conviction of the accused, saying that in view of the mitigating circumstances, the trial court had awarded death sentence to the accused, so that he could be converted to life imprisonment. The payment penalty was retained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer
