Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus GUL ZAMAN

The withdrawal of Articles 13 (4), (5b) and 15 of the West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959 was an agreement between the parties in the approval of the payment of the property to the tenants and the said landlord with the withdrawal. The landlord withdrew the request `later occupied the premises in the possession of the tenants and not through the execution of any evacuation order as no evacuation order was approved by the rent controller at the time of withdrawal of the eviction request. But otherwise was taken after the reconstruction of the premises, the tenants re-occupied the vacancies West Pakistan was filed under Section ban ordinance 1959 on urban rent 13 (4) and (5 B) to, but this request was rejected simultaneous rent by the controller and the appellate authority jayzyt question. Maintaining the tenant's use of the application for the refurbishment of the premises, h avenue appears only when there is a formal injunction in favor of the landlord and against the tenants when the agreement between the parties is made. In the event of the landlord's withdrawal request, the question of passing a formal eviction order against him did not arise. If the landlord has been charged with breaching a contract between the tenants, it is reasonable for the tenants to apply to the Civil Court on the applicability of Sections 13 (4) and (5B). The landlord may also enforce it against the landlord's question. ) The existence of the West Pakistan Citizens Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, will arise only when the landlord occupies the property in dispute. how to become a advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer