Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN LUQMAN versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Prevention of Section 497 (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Bail, Grant of the accused to any previous felony or misconduct Failed to display. The complainant had to submit the money involved in the case to the shopkeepers themselves in order to trap him wrongly and as the accused was a food inspector, he did not have to go to and receive the complainant's shop. The office was and was to be there and the money paid to the government was to be deposited in the bank and in connection with the collection of the disputed amount, no officer version offered by the accused was ever convinced or appropriate prosecutor. There was ample evidence on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime and the explanation given by the accused was not sufficient for his apology. Involvement in illegal trespassing, even if its case did not fall under the section 497 (1), CRPC prohibition clause, was an exception and there is no rule, for those involved in corruption Had not been dealt with, corruption would have spread. The society alleges that he could not file a case for grant of bail, his plea dismissed. lawer from fb area from Rangoo lawyer