AAZAZ AHMAD versus SHAUKAT BEGUM
Non-implementation of sections 96, 115 and 10, R 10 of the Code of Conduct, 1906, was dismissed by the Court of Appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial court on the ground that a woman who was a defendant in this case Was enforced as a plaintiff. It was not applied to the trial court as a party to the appeal because it was stated that the reason for not implementing the woman was that her name was omitted in the duty sheet prepared by the trial court's office, But the appellate court failed to appeal the fact that the court had rejected material appeals and demonstrated material misconduct in exercising its jurisdiction, rejecting the appeal on a brief basis, stating that the woman had in her view The High Court was not enforced under the second jurisdiction and the order of the appellate court was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Hariwala lawyer
