Find a Lawyer

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/34 34 died from the definition of evidence, entering the hospital, was not in a position to describe the snake and did not submit to the doctor, who gave the certificate about the fitness of the injured. , Both witnesses were closely related to the suspect, but none of them reported the matter to the police for three days. When the doctor examined the deceased, he did not find the police when the injured was shifted to the hospital and suffered a three-day delay in filing an FIR. Eyewitnesses were not present at the time of the incident were not supported to support that the prosecution of the alleged carbon recovery had no benefit as no crime was recovered from the incident. The person involved was involved in the 15 criminal case brought on the judicial file could not possibly be excluded if he was killed by any other enemy of the deceased. In this case, the prosecution's story was suspicious and the accused was able to build a tent in this story; He had filed a lawsuit. Even the death penalty evidence should come from unforgivable sources and should be of a high standard, which failed to prove the prosecution's prosecution, sentence and sentence against the prosecutor in the case. The court was set aside and acquitted, giving them the benefit of the doubt inheritance advocates near Musafir Khana lawyer