MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA versus THE STATE
Pakistan Panel Code S, 426 (1A) Panel Code (XLV of 1860), section 3 and 34 suspended the rifle from the death penalty, threw it down, kept a guard so that the other four witnesses could not interfere and Facilitated the co-accused, including the victim's right arm and right leg amputation, including a temporary diagnosis. Such material aspects showed that the accused acted in such a way that it showed that he was a hard-hearted, carefree and hopeless character. If no appeal was made for an accused who was sentenced to life imprisonment or imprisonment for more than seven years. For the two-year period of his sentence, the appellate court may release him on bail, but the court may refuse to release him on bail for reasons of writ. g The court did not consider touching the merits of this case while refusing to suspend the conviction on a legal basis, but the court may consider the evidence submitted to determine whether the accused is in section 426 (1). Was guilty of the categories listed. A), CR PC alleges that he was not entitled to the suspension of a hard-hearted, hard-working, expert character.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Ahmadpur East lawyer