AAMAR YOUSAF versus SAJID ALI
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 395 Bail, Trial Court hearing the bail hearing of the passenger on the statement of another passenger of the car in which he said The money was robbed that the accused was not present at the time of the incident. In the presence of the money and the firearm was recovered from them, accusing one of the other witnesses will not lead to further investigation, especially when the crime is a robbery. And robbers armed with deadly weapons robbed a witness who had no connection to the owner of the car or whose driver could be sued. The court did not investigate the matter in depth to find out why the witness denied his statement in the presence of other eye witness statements. The order to bail the accused with the Commission of Trial Court in remanding the accused, who did not use his discretion properly, was reversed and the bail was canceled.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer