Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM AWAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE

Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 (XXI of 1952), sections 132, 133, 133a and 133b (as amended by the Pakistan Army (Amendment) Act (XXVIII of 1992))] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition charged with maintaining the Field General Court Martial Petitioner / Defendant who allegedly disclosed secrets to defense to foreign intelligence agencies under the Official Secrets Act 1923 And it was challenged by the Field General Court Martial Petitioner. Punishment or punishment by constitutional petition When the applicant was convicted and sentenced, the appeal was treated in Pakistan. Not available under the N Army Act 1952, i.e. the punishment imposed on the applicant was not applicable at the relevant time, the appeal would not mean that the applicant's conviction would be challenged by constitutional application such as voting rights. The applicant stated that in the absence of a legal right to appeal against his conviction at the relevant time, he could be challenged under the common law before the High Court, as the applicant could not have the right to appeal under the law. And whether there was an appeal forum or the availability of the right of appeal provided at the relevant time such as A (Amendment) Act will not create a right of appeal in favor of the application provided by the applicant maintains that the 1992 conviction appeal before the introduction of the provision in the relevant law. Instead of challenging their case either through appeal or constitutional petition to the High Court, their suit can be referred to the relevant forum under 5 132 of the Pakistan Army Act 1952 for appropriate assistance. ? immigration advocates email from Bahawalpur lawyer