Find a Lawyer

LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR versus K.M. SOHEL

Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunals Ordinance 1991 Section 8 Annual Confidential Reports Revealed Negative Comments The recording of such remarks was dismissed without the opportunity to be heard outside the time schedule set by the Government's Adult Remarks. The Judicial Service Tribunal allowed the appeal and remanded the case to the department to decide on the representation of the department, after which they were given the opportunity to hold a trial, also a representation under judicial setup. Has been dealt with which may not have any misconduct against members of the higher judiciary. * The Judicial Officer was not required to extend the right to a hearing unless otherwise disposed of from the Member of the Subordinate Judiciary, if the representation presented by an officer was decided against him. Have to decide on behalf of. The subordinate judiciary may redress its grievances before the judicial forum, ie, where it may fully benefit from the right to a hearing to the tribunal that the negative report or order was not sustained under the challenge, a judicial appeal, review or judicial officer. Representations filed by can be removed. Without hearing the person concerned by the High Court's Administrative Committee, where the Judicial Officer was inconsistent with the order of the Administrative Committee, he may protest his view before the Subordinate Judicial Services Tribunal where he has full opportunity to explain his case order. Will be given Submitted to the side by the Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal and allowed to Enel law firms from Bunner lawyer