Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus BILQEES AKHTAR

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), Section 30 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for declaration of evacuation property, two adjoining property owned by both parties. Were claiming rights. The evacuation properties transferred through the permanent settlement process were released in favor of the Allies, after which one of the properties was counted and re-demarcated, resulting in part of the property. The second property was included in which the applicant claimed ownership in the disputed section. The applicant summarized the orders of the Settlement Authorities on the re-counting of the property, but a copy of the order was not submitted by the trial court and the trial court did not accept such disputed property. Was maintained by the lower appellate court. The petitioner dismissed the decision before the High Court in the amendment, which also dismissed the recording of the summary order of the allegedly ordered by the settlement authorities in connection with the amended proceedings, until the recording was sufficient. Orders should not be presented in evidence to show that the applicant of the competent authority has not obtained any right / title in the suit property, nor any right to occupy the same courts below, By the way, it was rightly found that the applicant had no free right to occupy the property in dispute, LA was given permission to leave immigration advocate from Kundina lawyer