Section 365, 324, 353, 148 and 149 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2) Abduction, attempt to commit a murderous ambush, assault or criminal force to prevent a public servant from performing his duties; The prosecution's benefit of doubt over the success of the weapons-armed riot evidence was dismissed by the trial court on the ground that the prosecutor failed to prove the identity of the accused was dropped, but neither the kidnappers nor the police found the suspect in the original. He was convicted and he had serious doubts about the fact. The incident took place in a mood and manner, as prosecutors said, and the accused should know the benefit, however, and the station house officer said the shootings took place between the suspects and the police party, but there was no vacancy. Nor did anyone. He even suffered a concussion and expressed skepticism over the prosecution's case through the prosecution's failure to establish his case against the accused. After acquiring evidence from the trial court, the accused pleaded guilty to double innocence. It was admitted and the court will be slow to reverse the verdict of the sentence sitting on the appeal against the verdict, unless it admits the authenticity of the High Court, which is fake and fake. Refused to interfere with his decision to go bad
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
