IBRAR HUSSAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.W.F.P.
Article 5 (Article 212) (3) of the NWFP Service Tribunals Act, 1974, Article 212 (3), should be considered to allow the appeal to be passed by the Supreme Court, even though the appeal of a public servant before the tribunal presents the possibility of a departmental appeal before the departmental authority. Don't keep an eye. The 90-day legal period did not end. Even though the chairman of the service tribunal cannot ultimately hear and dispose of appeals to the elites while in isolation, it was likewise a violation of section 5 (1) of the Northwest Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act 1974.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Gilgit lawyer