Find a Lawyer

GULSHAN ALI versus SINDH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1973 Rr 3 & 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The appointment of the respondents by the applicants was challenged on the basis that initially three positions of Assistant. The advertisement for inviting applications for was given. Professors, but later the ad invited applicants for six positions to respond to those who were highly influential politicians and more suitable than the applicants, in fact, the posts Was advertised, not through. It is sufficient to hold that the defendants were mistreated to accommodate themselves. Applicants did not dispute respondents' eligibility for shared positions, but only claimed that they were better suited for the jobs described above that applicants failed to disclose authority to the respondents. Has exhibited dishonest, illegal and unlawful opinions / recommendations by the Authority for the appointment of defendants in respect of their fitness and suitability under the authority of the authority, not to interfere with the absence of good reasons. The appeal for leave of appeal can be dismissed us immigration advocates from Farooqabad lawyer