WALI MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Prior to the service tribunal's limitation on the validity of service appeal law, the application for employment of legal job was rejected and it failed to appeal its court. had lived. , Another appeal before the department and subsequently the application for review without success was filed before the service tribunal which was banned at the time of the employment ban, the public servant said, in relation to filing the appeal. Unaware of the deadline, there was no excuse for negligence in law or for review or other appeal or third appeal was provided in law The employee employed the methods and means under which the delay of nine months. Consequently such delays were not proposed under the law as the service tribunal did not waive because No reasonable justification was available. For this delay the service tribunal was fully aware of the decision and the facts of the case were not appreciated by the Judgment of Service Tribunal, which allowed the Supreme Court to intervene where the service tribunal made the case. The appeal was dismissed on the basis of limitation without touching on the merits, it will not issue the same order. Legally under appeal, under appeal, to guarantee the intervention of the Supreme Court so that the appeal is denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kallat lawyer