DR. GULSHAN ALI versus SINDH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1973 Rr 3 & 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The appointment of the respondents by the applicants was challenged on the basis that initially three positions of Assistant. The advertisement for inviting applications for was given. Professors, but as a result applicants for six positions were invited to respond to those who had links with highly influential political figures and applicants were more suitable than respondents, the fact that the posts were advertised. Was done, would not be itself. It is sufficient to understand that it was mistreated to accommodate the defendants. Applicants did not dispute respondents' eligibility for advertiser positions, but only claimed that they were appropriate for the jobs described above that applicants failed to disclose this option Respondents behaved dishonestly. Whether the statement of authority for appointment of defendants in relation to their fitness and suitability under the qualification of Malala and Illegal Opinion / Proposal cannot be interrupted in the absence of good reasons for leave of appeal. Request for was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
