WALI MUHAMMAD KHOKHAR versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Prior to the service tribunal's limitation on the validity of service appeal law, the application for employment of legal job was rejected and it failed to appeal its court. had lived. , Another appeal before the department and subsequently a review petition was filed without success. The Appeal Service was referred to the Service Tribunal before the time restriction was stopped. The public servant said he was unaware of the time limit for filing an appeal, there was no excuse for the law to be reviewed or another appeal or third appeal provided for in the law by the public servant. And resorted to sources that were not proposed under the law as a result of the nine-month delay. Such a delay was not waived by the service tribunal because no reasonable justification was available. For this delay the service tribunal was fully aware of the decision and the facts of the case were not appreciated by the Judgment of Service Tribunal, which allowed the Supreme Court to intervene where the service tribunal made the case. The appeal was dismissed on the basis of limitation without touching on the merits, it will not issue the same order. Legally under appeal, under appeal, to guarantee the intervention of the Supreme Court so that the appeal is denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Guddu lawyer