Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIR versus THE STATE

Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 10 (4) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 12 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) appeal of the jurisdiction of the Anti-Terrorism Court. Permission granted by the Supreme Court to consider the prisoners of the accused that the Special Court constituted under the Anti-Terrorism Act has no jurisdiction to hear the case, except for lack of jurisdiction. He was also not charged under the relevant section of the Anti-Terrorism Act. Appeal before the High Court was not even capable of enforcing this count, as well as the express ban in the relevant law and constitution. That the accused was not prosecuted under section 11 of the Adultery (1979) Ordinance of Crime because it indicates that the kidnapper was not deceived, by means of fraud or by fraud Was taken by force. That the witnesses of the abduction were not presented to support the prosecution's case on this point and that the offense was not proved under section 10 (4) of the Ordinance as to support the charge. There was no authentic evidence. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Liaquat Pur lawyer