Section 9 (c) Determination of the Detention of Drugs and Validation of Evidence Defendant's defense in which he was falsely registered by the police as a result of the prosecution's testimony was not proved He was arrested on the spot on the spot after the accused was captured. A large quantity of 30kg of marijuana was brought to the trial court's six witnesses from the motorcade of the accused's prosecution, nothing was on record, or there was any suggestion that the police hostile to the accused. On the basis of which the accused was registered. Not to argue that the statement of the prosecution's witness was trustworthy, straightforward and true, and that no witnesses were unwanted witnesses and no further action was taken to refute that statement, two different types of marijuana samples Franz The science was sent to the laboratory, which reported that more than 10kg of culprits were recovered from the suspects. The quantity of marijuana was strongly positive and the technical level was punished. In view of the fact, the accused could not benefit and it was alleged that a large amount of cash was recovered from the accused. R can not be denied that responsibility. Awareness of the transport of such a large quantity of intoxicating goods cannot be ignored; despite some minor contradictions and some flaws, the prosecutor proved his case beyond any shadow of a doubt. At trial, the accused was sentenced or sentenced and the appropriate sentence was given. As for the accused, retained, and appealed for power, Barkha
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
