The testimony of Section 9 (c) drug possession and the value of smuggling evidence have long been examined by the witnesses, but the defense failed to damage or disperse their testimony, accusing its minority. Could not be proved because it was fully proved that he was 24 years old at the time of his arrest and at the time of recording his statement, under Section 234 Cr, CCP Alibi was about 26 years, e.g. That the accused had taken him, contradicted himself, the defendant's confession regarding the eviction of the sanctions that were pending before the trial. Egypt was, because I was a police officer presented himself. The prosecutor, who was legally sealed in two bags, had undoubtedly set up the recovery of a large amount of defects. He was being motivated by the accused, with the confidentiality of the confiscated motor vehicle, about which he was being molested. There was complete information that there was no enmity or rebellion with the official witnesses who appeared against the accused. And it was impossible to cultivate such a large quantity of drugs, their testimony with regard to time, place and method of recovery could not be excluded, after the trial court considered every evidence on record. Defendant's defense version was rightly rejected. With regard to the samples, the forensic science laboratory set aside a number of prohibitions, the prosecution having a positive trial, which successfully established the case against the accused as evidence of the four witnesses who testified before the trial court, Which is absolutely scattered through defense during cross-examination
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
