Find a Lawyer

HAFTAY KHAN versus STATE

In Section 9 (c) and 25 Criminal Procedures (v. 1898), the recovery of value recovery evidence of section 103 drug was recovered from a truck driven by a 20 kg truck accused of police witnesses. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. The suspect was that no witness was associated with the public during the recovery process and only the police officers were witnesses. In non-compliance of section 103, the CCP could not be considered as a strong basis for the legislature's view that the trial against the accused was bad. Authorized witnesses and their statements could not be excluded simply because they belonged to the police department and were involved in the charge-sheet and due to the reasons presented by the court at trial, the judge conducted a fair review of the evidence. In accordance with the prescribed principles of justice. The court interfered with the verdict of the verdict and no illegal or weak found in the Senate. Tension was sustained

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• MOMEEN KHAN v. KHANZADA 2013 YLR 1344
• MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. State 2013 YLR 1357
• IRFAN AHMAD v. GOMAL UNIVERSITY, D.I. KHAN 2013 MLD 1365
• GUL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PRIVATE (LIMITED), KOHAT v. NAIK MUHAMMAD 2013 CLC 1371
• SAID HAKIM v. State 2013 YLR 1390
• ABDUL AHAD v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1391
• ACT INTERNATIONAL v. PROVINCIAL EARTHQUAKE REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY 2013 YLR 1396
• Engineer SIDDIQ ULLAH v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Chief Secretary, Peshawar 2013 PLC(CS) 1405

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

tax advocates from Phool nagar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes