SARFRAZ versus SULTAN AHMAD
Section 21, 25 and 29 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, XVII of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (1967), change the date of the decree for the submission of the pre-arrest amount of Section 164, on the Board of Revenue Forum Accepts review against decisions. Under the date set forth in the Declaration for Submission of Copyright, the Accuracy Member, the Board of Revenue, had only the powers to deny the facts of the aforementioned forums in the jurisdiction of the judiciary, if such forum Has passed orders violating the law. As a result of their orders placed or held by the High Courts, the wrong reading or non-reading of the records did not disclose that the Member, Board of Revenue had received any illegal action through the forums, the Board of Revenue. Revenue only has the power to reverse. Concurrent results of reality after satisfying yourself on three principles. That is, the subordinate forum was under its jurisdiction. That the case was one in which the forum should exercise jurisdiction. And that in exercising the jurisdiction, the forum did not act illegally on the Member, the Board of Revenue, noting that the said forums violated the rules, the member's order. The Board of Revenue was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Taunsa sharif lawyer