NOOR KHAN versus JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT, ANTI-TERRORISM, SARGODHA DIVISION, SARGODHA
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 23, 6, 7 and 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application to transfer the case to court regularly because of previous murder enmity Relative and obliged, the civil servant, was not killed because he was a patwari or because of the special court's patwari argument that the trial was due to be heard because Patwari was killed while on duty. Was not sustainable because it would mean that when a civil servant was killed on duty, he would have a trial by the Anti-Terrorist Court and when he was killed on duty, he would be able to There was no hearing, Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 Do not make any such classification case unless the acid element of terror was added to it and the aforesaid Act and its provisions,, & 8 There was no nexus with it, because it was a simple case of pre-murder rivalry and not because of it. The method that targeted terrorism or created a sense of fear and insecurity in people or in a part of the people except for every sense of insecurity in ordinary crimes, Grady was born at the time of the court's commission. Trial the case and the High Court directed the court to send the decision that the constitutional application having full jurisdiction was accepted accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
