Find a Lawyer

RAO ABDIIL JABBAR KHAN versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, Array 11 and 13 Superior Intelligence Supreme Court in their decision, in the first round of litigation, decided that the appellant / public servant. , Considered and promoted in Grade 18, will retain their seniority respondents / authority who should have given seniority due to Appellant in Grade 18 after correction of the controversial seniority list, rather than one of the officers And the sanitary list should also be circulated wherein the appellant's younger officers were shown senior to them. The same justification was for the appellant / public servant, who was already senior to the lower level co-government employee, rather than the subsequent appointment of a co-public servant, should justify any justification with a government employee, I should have been a senior as a co-government employee. The next advanced appellant's sanity secured under R13 (i) of the Sindh Civil Servant (Probation, Certification and Senior). ity) Rules, 1975, should have been granted the sanity which was already set by the Supreme Court in its first decision law firms from Chashma lawyer