Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

Sindh Civil Servants (Qualifications and Discipline) Rules 1973 RR 5, 6 and 7 (2) The Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1974), section 4 Service installations to investigate government employees against them on certain allegations of corruption. Was subsequently dismissed. The inquiry committee's inquiries were illogical and illegal, as the inquiry proceedings were conducted by three persons, but the results were signed by two members. The inquiry report was based only on the statement of the complainant, which was used by public servants and witnesses. The statements were not disputed. In accordance with the rules by the inquiry committee and various additions, alterations, deletions in the inquiry report and the statements of public servants and witnesses, not recorded by any of the members, the department inquiry was signed by any member of the inquiry committee Or they have not been launched. They were considered to be a judicial proceeding under the provisions of R7 (2) of the Sindh Government Employees (Competence and Discipline) Rules, 1974 complete proceedings of the Inquiry Committee, which stated that there were gross errors / omissions or omissions. The law was outlawed and would constitute sufficient bounds to reject the dismissal order approved by the authorities against civil servants. list of advocates from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer