Find a Lawyer

ILYAS KHICHI versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR?GENERAL OF POLICE

Police Rules 1934 Rr 12 8, 12 14 & 12 1 and the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XIV of 1974), termination of section 4 of the services of public servants were certain to be terminated under some serious allegations against them when they were selected. After having been trained, and in the face of allegations against a public servant who had been "defamed" on his role by a procedure set by the competent selection board, it would have been a proper full department. It was necessary to conduct an inquiry and he could only do so if the charges against him were established. Punishment was made on the basis of the allegations, but no inquiry was made that the order passed under Police Rules, R128 of 1934, was "non-submission", giving jurisdiction in particular. It was forbidden where high courts / legal forums can consider \ The surprise of the proceedings is whether the required formal ceremonies were observed, the public servant was also seriously condemned as he did not issue any show cause notice. Was granted and the opportunity for a personal hearing was not allowed to terminate the discretionary services of public servants. While he has violated the principles of natural justice were separated and were ordered to restore the job again. law websites from Khoski lawyer